{"id":2953,"date":"2024-01-21T19:57:33","date_gmt":"2024-01-21T19:57:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/virelemisest-ulesaamine-post-pandeeemia-emotsionaalne-tervis\/"},"modified":"2024-01-21T19:57:33","modified_gmt":"2024-01-21T19:57:33","slug":"virelemisest-ulesaamine-post-pandeeemia-emotsionaalne-tervis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/virelemisest-ulesaamine-post-pandeeemia-emotsionaalne-tervis\/","title":{"rendered":"Pandeemiaj\u00e4rgse elu emotsionaalsel maastikul"},"content":{"rendered":"

Kokkuv\u00f5te:<\/strong> Selles artiklis k\u00e4sitletakse m\u00f5iste “igatsemine”, mille on populariseerinud Adam Grant, r\u00f5hutades selle levikut pandeemiaj\u00e4rgsel ajastul. Artiklis arutletakse, kuidas eristatakse igatsemist ja selliseid tunnustatud vaimse tervise seisundeid nagu depressioon ja l\u00e4bip\u00f5lemine. Teos annab \u00fclevaate sellest, kuidas toksiline positiivsus v\u00f5ib varjata t\u00f5elisi emotsionaalseid seisundeid, ning pakub v\u00e4lja praktilisi strateegiaid igatsuse \u00fcletamiseks, n\u00e4iteks t\u00e4helepanelikkuse omaksv\u00f5tmine ja “voolu” leidmine igap\u00e4evastes tegevustes. See on juhendiks meie praeguse aja keerulisel emotsionaalsel maastikul navigeerimiseks, propageerides vaimse tervise probleemide n\u00fcansirikkamat m\u00f5istmist ja aktsepteerimist.
\n_________________<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Eesti keeles<\/strong><\/p>\n

P\u00e4rast Adam Granti raamatusse s\u00fcvenemist viis mu uudishimu mind tema kirjutiste juurde. Nende hulgas oli ka New York Timesi artikkel pealkirjaga “There’s a Name for the Blah You’re Feeling: It’s Called Languishing”, mis paistis silma mitte ainult oma laialdase lugejaskonna ja allalaadimise, vaid ka selle p\u00fcsiva asjakohasuse poolest, mis ulatub kaugemale kui 2021. aasta kriis.<\/p>\n

V\u00e4ljav\u00f5tted Granti artiklist avanevad nii:<\/p>\n

“Esialgu v\u00e4ltisid meid k\u00f5iki l\u00e4bivad s\u00fcmptomid \u00e4ratundmist. Seltsimehed r\u00e4\u00e4kisid koondumisprobleemidest. Kolleegid v\u00e4ljendasid 2021. aasta suhtes v\u00e4hese innukuse puudumist. Sugulased j\u00e4id hilja magama, vaadates uuesti filmi “National Treasure”, kuigi teadsid selle s\u00fc\u017eeed peast. Selle asemel, et hommikul voodist v\u00e4lja h\u00fcpata, leidsin end seitsmeni venitamas, oma telefoni s\u00fcvenedes.”<\/p>\n

See ei olnud l\u00e4bip\u00f5lemine – energiavarud ei olnud ammendunud. Samuti ei olnud see depressioon – lootusetuse tunne puudus. Pigem tundsime nebulast r\u00f5\u00f5mu ja sihitamatuse tunnet. Selle kohta on olemas termin: igatsus.<\/p>\n

\u00dcmbers\u00f5it: Minu meelest tekitab “igatsemine” kujutlusi materiaalsest puudusest. Kuid ingliskeelsele terminile “languishing” pakutakse alternatiive nagu “n\u00e4rtsimine” v\u00f5i “h\u00e4\u00e4bumine”. Sellise s\u00fcnge ajastu k\u00e4sitlemisel tundub “n\u00e4rtsimine” sobilik, kuid “languishing” sulandub teksti sujuvamalt. Ma ei suutnud leida \u00fchtegi juhtumit, kus ‘languishing’ oleks eesti keeles kasutatud vaimse tervise kontekstis. Hiljem tuli meelde ka ‘vindumine’.<\/p>\n

Sellega seotud TEDi k\u00f5nes v\u00e4idab Grant, et vastused nagu “Fantastic!” v\u00f5i “Living my best life!” k\u00fcsimusele “How are you?” t\u00e4hendavad toksilist positiivsust. Pandeemia ajal oleks sobilikum \u00f6elda: “Ma igatsen\/haigun\/haigestun”.<\/p>\n

Toksilist positiivsust m\u00e4\u00e4ratletakse kui liigset, ebaefektiivset \u00f5nneliku, optimistliku seisundi liigset \u00fcldistamist k\u00f5igis stsenaariumides. Selle tulemuseks on indiviidi autentse emotsionaalse kogemuse eitamine, v\u00e4hendamine ja kehtetuks tunnistamine.<\/p>\n

Nagu k\u00f5ik muu, muutub liigne positiivsus m\u00fcrgiseks, eriti kui seda kasutatakse inimkogemuste varjamiseks v\u00f5i vaigistamiseks. Teatud emotsioonide olemasolu eitamine sukeldab meid eitamise ja allasurutud tunnete seisundisse. T\u00f5de on see, et inimesed on vigased. Me tunneme kadedust, viha, kurbust, pettumust ja ahnust. M\u00f5nikord on elu lihtsalt s\u00fcnge. Teesklemine, et oleme “pidevas positiivse vibratsiooni seisundis”, eitab inimeseks olemise tegelikkust.<\/p>\n

J\u00e4tkates artiklit:<\/p>\n

Langetamine on stagnatsiooni ja t\u00fchjuse tunne. See on nagu p\u00e4evade vedamine, elu vaatamine l\u00e4bi uduse tuuleklaasi. See emotsioon v\u00f5ib domineerida 2021.<\/p>\n

Samal ajal, kui teadlased ja meedikud tegelevad longovidi f\u00fc\u00fcsiliste s\u00fcmptomitega, v\u00f5itlevad paljud pandeemia emotsionaalsete tagaj\u00e4rgedega.<\/p>\n

Pandeemiast tingitud pikaajaline masendus on arenenud krooniliseks igatsuseks.<\/p>\n

Ps\u00fchholoogiliselt ulatub vaimne tervis depressioonist \u00f5itsva heaoluni. \u00d5itseng on heaolu tipp: tugev tunne eesm\u00e4rgist, meisterlikkusest ja t\u00e4htsusest. Depressioon esindab heaolu madalseisu: meeleheite, kurnatuse ja v\u00e4\u00e4rtusetuse tunne.<\/p>\n

Kannatamine on vaimse tervise t\u00e4helepanuta j\u00e4etud keskmine laps, t\u00fchjus depressiooni ja \u00f5itsengu vahel – heaolu puudumine. Teil ei esine vaimuhaiguse s\u00fcmptomeid, kuid samas ei ole te ka vaimse tervise eeskujuks. Te ei t\u00f6\u00f6ta t\u00e4isv\u00f5imsusel. K\u00f5hnumine kahandab teie motivatsiooni, h\u00e4irib keskendumist ja kolmekordistab v\u00e4henenud t\u00f6\u00f6v\u00f5ime t\u00f5en\u00e4osust. See on vaieldamatult levinum kui tavaline depressioon – ja potentsiaalselt suurem riskifaktor vaimse haiguse tekkeks.<\/p>\n

Selle termini l\u00f5i v\u00e4lja sotsioloog Corey Keyes, kes m\u00e4rkas, et paljud, kes ei olnud depressioonis, ei olnud ka \u00f5itsevad. Tema uuringud n\u00e4itavad, et need, kellel on j\u00e4rgmisel k\u00fcmnendil k\u00f5ige suurem t\u00f5en\u00e4osus depressiooni ja \u00e4revush\u00e4irete tekkeks, kannatavad praegu k\u00f5ige rohkem. Itaalia pandeemiliste tervishoiut\u00f6\u00f6tajate t\u00f5endid n\u00e4itavad, et 2020. aasta kevadel langenute puhul diagnoositi kolm korda suurema t\u00f5en\u00e4osusega traumaj\u00e4rgne stressih\u00e4ire kui nende kolleegidel.<\/p>\n

Osa langetamise ohtlikkusest on salakavalus – r\u00f5\u00f5m h\u00e4\u00e4bub, hoog v\u00e4heneb m\u00e4rkamatult. Te ei m\u00e4rka, et libistate end \u00fcksindusse; te olete \u00fcksk\u00f5iksed oma \u00fcksk\u00f5iksuse suhtes. Tunnistamata oma kannatusi, ei otsi sa abi ega p\u00fc\u00fca isegi eneseabi.<\/p>\n

Isegi kui te ei kannata, teate t\u00f5en\u00e4oliselt kedagi, kes kannatab. Parem m\u00f5istmine v\u00f5ib aidata abi pakkuda tuge.<\/p>\n

Ps\u00fchholoogid leiavad, et emotsioonide nimetamine on \u00fcks parimaid strateegiaid nendega toimetulekuks. Eelmisel kevadel, pandeemia k\u00f5rgpunktis, kirjeldas Harvard Business Review’i k\u00f5ige loetum postitus meie kollektiivset ebamugavustunnet kui leina. Lisaks kaotatud l\u00e4hedaste leinale leinasime ka normaalsuse kaotust. “Suru” oli selles v\u00f5\u00f5ras kogemuses tuttav s\u00f5na. Kuigi me ei olnud varem pandeemiaga silmitsi seisnud, oli enamik neist kogenud kaotust. See aitas meil oma praeguste v\u00e4ljakutsetega toime tulla.<\/p>\n

Palju tuleb veel teada, mis p\u00f5hjustab igatsust ja kuidas selle vastu v\u00f5idelda, kuid selle nimetamine on esimene samm. See tuletab meile meelde, et me ei ole \u00fcksi: igatsemine on \u00fchine ja jagatud kogemus.<\/p>\n

Selle asemel, et vastata k\u00fcsimusele “Kuidas l\u00e4heb?” “H\u00e4sti!” v\u00f5i “H\u00e4sti”, kujutage ette, et \u00fctleksime: “Ausalt, ma igatsen”. See oleks v\u00e4rskendav vastukaal m\u00fcrgisele positiivsusele – sellele p\u00f5him\u00f5tteliselt ameeriklaste survele olla alati optimistlik.<\/p>\n

Kui lisate oma s\u00f5navarasse s\u00f5na “igatsev”, hakkate seda igal pool m\u00e4rkama. See on seal, kui teie p\u00e4rastl\u00f5unane jalutusk\u00e4ik tundub pettumust valmistav. See on teie laste h\u00e4\u00e4les, kui k\u00fcsite kaug\u00f5ppe kohta. See on igas “Meh”, mida “Simpsonite” tegelane \u00fctleb.<\/p>\n

Eelmisel suvel s\u00e4utsus ajakirjanik Daphne K. Lee hiina keele fraasi kohta, mis t\u00e4hendab “k\u00e4ttemaksu voodisse mineku edasil\u00fckkamist”. Ta kirjeldas seda kui hilis\u00f5htul \u00fcleval olemist, et n\u00f5uda tagasi p\u00e4eval kaotatud vabadus. Hakkasin m\u00f5tlema, kas see ei ole mitte niiv\u00f5rd k\u00e4ttemaks kontrolli kaotamise vastu, vaid vaikne trotsimine igatsuse vastu. See on r\u00f5\u00f5mu otsimine s\u00fcngelisel p\u00e4eval, \u00fchenduse otsimine \u00fcksildases n\u00e4dalas, eesm\u00e4rgi otsimine l\u00f5putus pandeemias.<\/p>\n

Mida saab teha igatsemise vastu? Vastum\u00fcrgiks v\u00f5ib olla “voolamise” m\u00f5iste. Pandeemia algusaegadel ei olnud parim heaolu ennustaja mitte optimism v\u00f5i t\u00e4helepanelikkus, vaid s\u00fcvenemine. Need, kes olid oma projektidega s\u00fcgavalt seotud, v\u00e4ltisid igatsemist ja s\u00e4ilitasid pandeemia-eelse rahulolu.<\/p>\n

Varahommikused s\u00f5nam\u00f5istatused kastavad mind voolusse. M\u00f5nikord teevad seda hilis\u00f5htused Netflixi nautimised – sukeldumine lugudesse, empaatia tegelastesse ja mure nende heaolu p\u00e4rast.<\/p>\n

Kuigi uute v\u00e4ljakutsete leidmine, meeldivad kogemused ja m\u00f5testatud t\u00f6\u00f6 on k\u00f5ik potentsiaalsed abin\u00f5ud igatsuse vastu, on raske sukelduda, kui keskendumine j\u00e4\u00e4b sinust k\u00f5rvale. See v\u00e4ljakutse eelnes pandeemiale, sest inimesed kontrollivad rutiinselt 74 korda p\u00e4evas e-kirju ja vahetavad \u00fclesandeid iga 10 minuti tagant.<\/p>\n

Pandeemia kujutab endast m\u00e4rkimisv\u00e4\u00e4rset kaotust. Igavusest \u00fclesaamiseks alustage v\u00e4ikeste v\u00f5itudega, nagu m\u00f5istatuse lahendamine v\u00f5i seitsmet\u00e4helise s\u00f5na kiire kokkupanemine. Selge tee voolavuseni on hallatav eesm\u00e4rk: v\u00e4ljakutse, mis pingutab teie oskusi ja tugevdab teie otsustavust. See t\u00e4hendab, et p\u00fchendage igap\u00e4evaselt aega m\u00f5ttekale v\u00e4ljakutsele – intrigeerivale projektile, v\u00e4\u00e4rikale eesm\u00e4rgile, sisulisele vestlusele. M\u00f5nikord on see v\u00e4ike samm selle poole, et taasavastada energia ja entusiasm, millest olete viimastel kuudel puudust tundnud.<\/p>\n

Kurnatus ei ole ainult meie peas – see on meie oludes. Me elame ikka veel maailmas, mis normaliseerib f\u00fc\u00fcsilise tervise probleeme, kuid stigmatiseerib vaimse tervise probleeme. Kuna me astume pandeemiaj\u00e4rgsesse reaalsusesse, on aeg \u00fcmber m\u00f5elda meie arusaam vaimse tervise ja heaolu kohta. “Mitte depressioon” ei t\u00e4henda, et te ei ole ilma probleemideta. “Ei ole l\u00e4bip\u00f5lenud” ei t\u00e4henda, et v\u00f5ite s\u00e4rada. Tunnistades, et nii paljud meist igatsevad, saame hakata andma h\u00e4\u00e4lt vaiksele meeleheitele ja valgustama teed t\u00fchjusest v\u00e4lja.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

_________________<\/p>\n

Originaal<\/strong><\/p>\n

Overcoming Languishing: Navigating the Emotional Terrain of Post-Pandemic Life<\/p>\n

After delving into Adam Grant’s tome, my curiosity led me to his scribings. Amongst these, a piece in The New York Times, titled \u201cThere\u2019s a Name for the Blah You\u2019re Feeling: It\u2019s Called Languishing,\u201d stood out, not just for its widespread readership and downloads, but for its enduring relevance beyond the 2021 crisis.<\/p>\n

Excerpts from Grant’s article unfold thus:<\/p>\n

“Initially, the symptoms that pervaded us all eluded recognition. Comrades spoke of concentration woes. Colleagues expressed a lack of zest for the year 2021. A kin stayed up late, rewatching ‘National Treasure,’ despite knowing its plot by heart. Instead of leaping out of bed at dawn, I found myself lingering till seven, engrossed in my phone.”<\/p>\n

This wasn’t burnout \u2013 energy reserves were not depleted. Nor was it depression \u2013 a sense of hopelessness was absent. Rather, we felt a nebulous sense of joylessness and aimlessness. There’s a term for this: languishing.<\/p>\n

A detour: ‘Languishing,’ in my perception, conjures images of material destitution. Yet, for the English term ‘languishing,’ alternatives like ‘withering’ or ‘fading’ are suggested. In discussing such a dreary epoch, ‘withering’ seems apt, yet ‘languishing’ integrates more seamlessly into the text. I couldn’t locate any instance where ‘languishing’ was used in Estonian in the context of mental health. Later, ‘vindumine’ also sprang to mind.<\/p>\n

In a related TED talk, Grant posits that responses like ‘Fantastic!’ or ‘Living my best life!’ to the query ‘How are you?’ signify toxic positivity. During the pandemic, it would be more fitting to say, ‘I am languishing\/withering\/fading.’<\/p>\n

Toxic positivity is defined as an excessive, ineffective overgeneralization of a happy, optimistic state in all scenarios. Its result is the denial, diminishment, and invalidation of an individual’s authentic emotional experience.<\/p>\n

Like all else, positivity in excess turns venomous, especially when used to mask or mute human experiences. Denying the existence of certain emotions plunges us into a state of denial and suppressed feelings. The truth is, humans are flawed. We feel envy, anger, sorrow, frustration, and greed. Sometimes, life is simply dismal. Pretending to be in a ‘constant state of positive vibration’ denies the reality of being human.<\/p>\n

Continuing with the article:<\/p>\n

Languishing is a sensation of stagnation and emptiness. It’s as if one is dragging through days, viewing life through a foggy windshield. This emotion might dominate 2021.<\/p>\n

As scientists and medics tackle long-Covid’s physical symptoms, many grapple with the pandemic’s emotional aftermath.<\/p>\n

Pandemic-induced protracted dismay has evolved into chronic languishing.<\/p>\n

Psychologically, mental health spans from depression to flourishing well-being. Flourishing is the pinnacle of well-being: a strong sense of purpose, mastery, and significance. Depression represents the nadir of well-being: feelings of desperation, exhaustion, and worthlessness.<\/p>\n

Languishing is the overlooked middle child of mental health, a void between depression and flourishing \u2013 an absence of well-being. You exhibit no symptoms of mental illness, yet you’re not the poster child for mental health either. You’re not operating at full capacity. Languishing dulls your motivation, disrupts focus, and triples the likelihood of diminished job performance. It’s arguably more common than conventional depression \u2013 and potentially a greater risk factor for mental illness.<\/p>\n

This term was coined by sociologist Corey Keyes, who noticed many who weren’t depressed weren’t thriving either. His studies suggest those most likely to experience depression and anxiety disorders in the next decade are currently languishing. Evidence from Italian pandemic healthcare workers indicates those languishing in spring 2020 were thrice as likely to be diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder as their counterparts.<\/p>\n

Part of the peril in languishing is the insidiousness \u2013 pleasure fades, drive diminishes unnoticed. You don’t realize you’re sliding into solitude; you’re indifferent to your indifference. Without recognizing your suffering, you don’t seek help or even attempt self-aid.<\/p>\n

Even if you’re not languishing, you likely know someone who is. A better understanding can assist in offering support.<\/p>\n

Psychologists find that naming emotions is among the best strategies for managing them. Last spring, at the pandemic’s zenith, the most read post on Harvard Business Review described our collective discomfort as grief. Alongside mourning lost loved ones, we grieved the loss of normalcy. ‘Grief’ was a familiar word in this foreign experience. Though we hadn’t faced a pandemic before, most had experienced loss. This helped us navigate our current challenges.<\/p>\n

Much remains to be learned about what causes languishing and how to counter it, but naming it is a first step. It reminds us that we’re not alone: languishing is a common and shared experience.<\/p>\n

Instead of responding to ‘How are you?’ with ‘Great!’ or ‘Fine,’ imagine if we said: ‘Honestly, I’m languishing.’ It would be a refreshing counter to toxic positivity \u2013 this fundamentally American pressure to always be optimistic.<\/p>\n

By adding ‘languishing’ to your vocabulary, you’ll start noticing it everywhere. It’s there when your afternoon walk feels disappointing. It’s in your children’s voices when you ask about remote learning. It’s in every ‘Meh’ uttered by a character in ‘The Simpsons.’<\/p>\n

Last summer, journalist Daphne K. Lee tweeted about a Chinese phrase meaning ‘revenge bedtime procrastination.’ She described it as staying up late to reclaim the freedom lost during the day. I began to wonder if this was not so much a retaliation against control loss, but a silent defiance against languishing. It’s seeking joy on a dreary day, connection in a lonely week, purpose in an endless pandemic.<\/p>\n

What can be done about languishing? The concept of ‘flow’ might be an antidote. In the pandemic’s early days, the best predictor of well-being wasn’t optimism or mindfulness, but immersion. Those deeply engaged in their projects avoided languishing and maintained pre-pandemic satisfaction.<\/p>\n

Early morning word puzzles immerse me in flow. Sometimes, late-night Netflix binges do the trick \u2013 immersing you in stories, empathizing with characters, and worrying about their well-being.<\/p>\n

While finding new challenges, enjoyable experiences, and meaningful work are all potential remedies for languishing, it’s hard to immerse yourself when focus eludes you. This challenge predates the pandemic, with people routinely checking emails 74 times a day and switching tasks every 10 minutes.<\/p>\n

The pandemic represents a significant loss. To overcome languishing, start with small victories, like solving a puzzle or quickly assembling a seven-letter word. A clear path to flow is a manageable goal: a challenge that stretches your skills and bolsters your resolve. It means dedicating daily time to a meaningful challenge \u2013 an intriguing project, a worthy goal, a substantive conversation. Sometimes, it’s a small step towards rediscovering the energy and enthusiasm you’ve missed these past months.<\/p>\n

Languishing isn’t just in our heads \u2013 it’s in our circumstances. We still inhabit a world that normalizes physical health challenges but stigmatizes mental health ones. As we step into a post-pandemic reality, it’s time to rethink our understanding of mental health and well-being. ‘Not depressed’ doesn’t mean you’re without struggles. ‘Not burnt out’ doesn’t imply you can shine. By acknowledging that so many of us are languishing, we can start giving voice to quiet despair and illuminating the path out of emptiness.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

 <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Kokkuv\u00f5te: Selles artiklis k\u00e4sitletakse m\u00f5iste “igatsemine”, mille on populariseerinud Adam Grant, r\u00f5hutades selle levikut pandeemiaj\u00e4rgsel ajastul. Artiklis arutletakse,…\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2190,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[322],"tags":[575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583],"class_list":{"0":"post-2953","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-health","8":"tag-adam-grant-en","9":"tag-emotsionaalne-heaolu-en","10":"tag-pandeeemia-stress-en","11":"tag-psuhholoogiline-vastupidavus-en","12":"tag-teadvelolek-en","13":"tag-toksiline-positiivsus-en","14":"tag-vaimne-tervis-en","15":"tag-virelemine-en","16":"tag-virelemisest-ulesaamine-en"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2953"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2953\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2190"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vool.arvojuhkov.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}